By: Steven Salop (ProMarket)
The consumer welfare standard, the guiding principle for Antitrust practice and enforcement for much of recent history, may be coming to an end. Ideas for replacing the existing “consumer” label with a more inclusive or general term, such as “trading partner” welfare, include considering standards such as competitive process protection, effective competition, protecting competition, inclusive growth, anti-monopoly, and freedom from domination.
As for author Steven Salop, his own choice is the “Reasonable Competitive Conduct” (“RCC”) standard, which is a hyprid sharing some of the basic concerns and features of other standards mentioned above, including a recognition of the importance of trading partner welfare, while making an effort to maintain the language and spirit of the Sherman, Clayton, and FTC Acts.
In this short article, the author focuses the standard more narrowly, to describe what might be referred to as “vertical coercion”, and addressing two separate, and sometimes conflicting, concerns…
Featured News
European Music Streaming Firms Rally Against Apple’s Proposed Remedies
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
The Concept of Ecosystem: A Shield, a Sword, or Janus?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Rethinking Competition Enforcement for Sustainable Data-Driven Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI