According to Bloomberg, a court decision greenlighting the planned merger of travel booking platforms Sabre and Farelogix was set aside Monday, July 20th, by the Third Circuit, which held that the ruling became moot when the deal was scrapped after UK regulators came out the other way.
Since the appellate order expresses “no opinion on the merits,” it “should not be construed as detracting from the persuasive force of the district court’s decision, should courts and litigants find its reasoning persuasive,” a three-judge panel wrote.
The one-page ruling rewarded the Justice Department’s persistent efforts to undo a Delaware federal judge’s ruling rejecting the government’s bid to block the $360 million tie-up.
Even after the UK decision the next day led the parties to terminate the deal, the DOJ pressed on to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, arguing that Judge Leonard P. Stark’s widely criticized reasoning could upend merger enforcement.
Stark let the transaction move forward in April, saying Sabre and Farelogix don’t count as competitors under the US Supreme Court’s controversial 2018 ruling in Ohio v. American Express because Sabre is a “two-sided” companyand Farelogix isn’t.
The DOJ originally appealed Stark’s ruling on the merits. After the deal was called off, it asked the Third Circuit to vacate the decision instead, saying it “could have an outsized effect on cases involving competition in the digital economy, where it is not uncommon for multi-sided platforms to face competition from one-sided rivals.”
The government doubled down on its arguments last month, after Farelogix reached a new deal to be acquired by Vista Equity Partners subsidiary Accelya, a Barcelona-based travel tech company.
Sabre and Farelogix opposed the request, saying the DOJ played a role in rendering the ruling moot by coordinating closely with the U.K. regulators who blocked the merger. The government shouldn’t get a “reward” for its “gamesmanship,” the companies said.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand