
The Chinese-owned app, which boasts over 14 million monthly users in Canada, is requesting that the court overturn the shutdown order issued last month. Alternatively, TikTok has asked the court to return the matter to the government for reconsideration, with guidance on how to address concerns.
A spokesperson for the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry defended the government’s position, stating, “the Government’s decision was informed by a thorough national security review and advice from Canada’s security and intelligence community,” as reported by Reuters.
Related: TikTok Enlists Veteran Supreme Court Advocate to Fight Potential US Ban
TikTok’s Canadian operations have been under scrutiny since last year, when Ottawa began investigating its plans for investment and expansion in the country. The review culminated in a government directive requiring the company to wind up its business activities. While the order does not block Canadians from accessing TikTok, it effectively halts the company’s operations within Canada.
TikTok warned that the shutdown would result in significant job losses, impacting hundreds of employees. In a statement regarding the legal challenge, the company said, “We believe it’s in the best interest of Canadians to find a meaningful solution and ensure that a local team remains in place, alongside the TikTok platform.”
Under Canadian law, the government has the authority to assess risks posed by foreign investments to national security, but the specifics of such reviews are kept confidential.
The Canadian directive mirrors actions taken in the United States, where the Biden administration has targeted TikTok over national security concerns. In April, President Joe Biden signed legislation requiring TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to divest its U.S. assets by January 2025 or face a potential nationwide ban. Earlier this week, TikTok and ByteDance filed appeals seeking to block the enforcement of the U.S. law while awaiting a Supreme Court review.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li