
The consumers leading antitrust litigation over an alleged industrywide scheme to fix broiler chicken prices won final approval from a federal judge in Chicago for their $181 million class action settlement with Pilgrim’s Pride, Tyson Foods, and other poultry processors, reported Bloomberg.
Judge Thomas M. Durkin signed off late Monday on six agreements resolving “indirect purchaser” claims in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, though he held off ruling on a $60 million fee request by counsel for the consumers.
The deal includes a $99 million agreement with Tyson, a $76 million pact with Pilgrim’s, and four settlements with smaller poultry processors worth a combined $6 million. Durkin called it “fair, reasonable, and adequate” in light of the costs and risks of additional litigation.
“While damages in this case are estimated to be in the billions, the risks of non-recovery have been significant,” the judge wrote. “The court’s 92-page decision denying the motions to dismiss was a relatively close call,” and success going forward “is no guarantee,” he added.
The ruling comes three days after a group of 10 current and former chicken executives—including two ex-CEOs of Pilgrim’s—forced a mistrial of criminal antitrust charges stemming from the alleged price-fixing scheme.
It also follows about three weeks after Durkin awarded $55 million in legal fees to counsel for the chicken wholesalers leading another part of the sprawling civil case. The wholesalers settlements to date are worth $170 million.
The consolidated proposed class actions, which began in 2016, are part of a wave of cartel cases involving livestock and protein, including beef, turkey, pork, tuna, salmon, and eggs.
The broiler chicken industry has been particularly hard hit. Along with the main civil case and the criminal charges, top poultry processors and executives face claims they conspired to drive down pay for chicken farmers and their largely immigrant workforce.
Featured News
Fortnite Returns to Apple’s U.S. App Store After Five-Year Ban
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Court to Hear Case on Trump’s Firing of FTC Democrats
May 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK Government Suffers Third Successive Defeat on Data (Use and Access) Bill
May 20, 2025 by
CPI
Sex Toy Retailer Says Google Breaches EU Digital Market Rules
May 20, 2025 by
CPI
Latham & Watkins Expands Brussels Antitrust Team
May 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas