A PYMNTS Company

U.S.: Supreme Court to hear pharmaceutical reverse payments case

By  |  December 10, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday that it will hear a case that will settle a decades-long battle over whether pharmaceutical giants can pay competitors to prevent selling a generic form of a best-selling drug, a practice known as reverse payment patent settlements. Over the years, federal regulators have said the practice is in violation of antitrust law; pharmaceutical companies, on the other hand, argue the practice settles patent disputes and is a way to protect their product into which they have poured billions of dollars. A federal appeals court in Philadelphia was the first time the practice has been ruled in violation of competition law; three previous federal circuit courts of appeal have ruled that the practice is not illegal. The Federal Trade Commission was the first to file the suit in 2009, arguing that blocking generic drug sales raises prices and hurts consumers. A bill was drafted last year in Congress to outlaw the practice of paying off makers of generic forms of drugs, but it never made it to the floor.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Full Content: New York Times

    For more commentary on reverse payments, read our June 2012 Chronicle.

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.