Investment consultants, which advise groups such as pension trustees, could be forced to split up their businesses or face mandatory tenders for their work in new rules being mulled by the UK’s competition watchdog.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) released a working paper today as part of its ongoing plan to boost competition in the massive investment consultant and fiduciary management industry, which advises clients with more than £1.6 trillion (US$2.2 trillion) under management.
While demand for fiduciary management, a type of asset management service used by pension funds and other investors, has “grown strongly” in recent years, the CMA warned in a report on March 29, that a significant proportion of investors ultimately used their investment consultant’s own fiduciary management service.
The CMA said it found evidence that pension funds and other investors are being steered towards the services, which are often highly profitable, by their investment consultants, reinforcing concerns about a lack of competition in the asset management industry. “The evidence we have reviewed indicates that selling [fiduciary management] services to existing [investment consultancy] clients is an important part of many integrated firms’ strategies to grow their businesses,” it said.
Full Content: Financial Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Spain’s BBVA Remains Optimistic About Hostile Takeover of Sabadell
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Seek Dismissal of Texas Antitrust Lawsuit
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
EU to Boost Metal Sectors with Energy Relief and Safeguards
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Players’ Association Sues Tennis Governing Bodies Over Alleged Antitrust Violations
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Moves to Curb Big Tech’s Power with New Regulatory Bill
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li