
The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has approved the sale of Sporting Index’s assets by Spreadex, resolving competition concerns arising from the acquisition of the rival spread betting platform. Spreadex had purchased the business-to-consumer (B2C) arm of Sporting Index from FDJ in November 2023 for an undisclosed amount, but the CMA determined the merger would harm market competition.
Following an in-depth Phase 2 investigation, the CMA’s independent panel found that the acquisition effectively created a monopoly in the UK licensed online sports spread betting sector. According to Reuters, the CMA concluded that reduced competition could lead to higher prices, a more limited range of products, and a diminished user experience for consumers.
Panel’s Decision and Spreadex’s Response
Richard Feasey, chair of the CMA’s independent panel reviewing the case, emphasized the importance of maintaining competition in the sports spread betting market. He stated:
“This deal eliminates competition in the supply of licensed online sports spread betting services in the UK. Sports spread betting – like any other market – needs competition to drive good customer experience, maintain choice and keep prices competitive. To achieve this, we have decided that Spreadex should sell Sporting Index, so that customers can choose between two firms for the best user experience and prices, rather than having to use only one.”
Despite the CMA’s findings, Spreadex had initially criticized the ruling. The company had argued that the deal was relatively small in scale and had a limited impact on the broader sports betting market. According to Reuters, Spreadex further contended that if it had not acquired the Sporting Index B2C division, the likely outcome would have been the closure of the business due to a lack of credible alternative bidders.
Related: UK’s CMA Raises Concerns Over Spreadex-Sporting Index Acquisition
Remedy for Competition Concerns
The CMA panel ultimately deemed the proposed sale of Sporting Index sufficient to address its concerns. The sale will allow the market to maintain two competing operators, ensuring consumers continue to benefit from choice and competitive pricing in the niche sports spread betting market.
Sports spread betting differs from traditional fixed-odds betting by allowing wagers on a range of outcomes for a given event, offering greater variability in potential pay-offs. The panel highlighted the importance of preserving competition in this specialized market, which relies on competitive dynamics to deliver high-quality services and fair pricing.
Financial Context
Spreadex has demonstrated robust financial performance, reporting £103.2 million in revenue for the financial year ending May 2024. Despite its success, the company has faced regulatory hurdles since acquiring Sporting Index. In July, Spreadex expressed strong opposition to the CMA’s provisional findings, asserting that the acquisition did not negatively impact competition.
With the approval of the asset sale, Spreadex’s brief ownership of Sporting Index is set to conclude, marking a resolution to the regulatory dispute while ensuring consumer interests are protected in the UK’s sports spread betting market.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
China Summons Delivery Giants Over Unfair Competition Concerns
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Orders Sanctions Against Missouri for Noncompliance in Price-Fixing Probe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Confusion Reigns In AI Policy In US and Europe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
EU Clears ADNOC’s $16.3 Billion Acquisition of Covestro
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Antitrust Chief Says BBVA-Sabadell Merger Won’t Stifle Competition
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece