A PYMNTS Company

US: Consumers accuse Japanese tire companies of antitrust violations

 |  November 27, 2016

Three consumers are suing Japanese tire companies, alleging antitrust violations.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Jerry A. Anderson Sr. of Kentucky, Laura L. Larue of Kentucky, and Christopher A. Lee of Texas, filed a class action complaint, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nov. 15 in US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against Bridgestone Corporation, Bridgestone APM Company, Yamashita Rubber, Yusa Corporation, Sumitomo Riko Company, DTR Industries, Toyo Tire & Rubber, Toyo Tire North America OE Sales, and Toyo Automotive Parts (USA), alleging they participated in a conspiracy to artificially inflate the prices of anti-vibration rubber parts.

    According to the complaint, the plaintiffs suffered monetary damages from purchasing anti-vibration rubber parts at inflated prices. The plaintiffs allege the defendants engaged in anti-competitive practices to artificially inflate the price of their anti-vibration rubber parts.

    The plaintiffs seek trial by jury, damages, treble damages, enjoin and restrain the defendant, all legal fees and interest, plus all other relief the court deems just.

    Full Content: Legal News Line

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.