A federal judge has agreed to hear one of the insurance mega-merger cases but has handed off the other.
Bloomberg reports that US District Judge John Bates, in Washington, DC, said Friday that he would hear Humana Inc. and Aetna Inc.’s case in court. The companies are fighting antitrust regulators, who filed a lawsuit to block Aetna’s proposed $37 billion purchase of Louisville-based Humana.
Bates handed off a similar case involing two other big insurers, Cigna. and Anthem Inc., to another judge, who has yet to be assigned.
The US Department of Justice sued to block the two deals at the same time. The DOJ wanted the cases to be heard together, but the buying companies have asked for them to be heard separately.
Both Aetna and Anthem also asked for the cases to be heard in the fall, though the DOJ said it wouldn’t be ready until February. Aetna wanted its case to go first, in hopes of getting the matter decided of ahead of its Dec. 31 deadline to close the $37 billion deal, which was announced last year.
Bloomberg reports that this deadline is the reason that Bates decided to separate the cases and hear Humana and Aetna’s case first.
“Given the complexity and importance of these cases, the court cannot feasibly try and decide both in that time frame,” Bates wrote in a ruling cited by the publication. “Ultimately, it will be fairer to the parties and better for the public if one of the cases is randomly reassigned to another judge in this district, who can give it prompt and full attention while this judge does the same with the other.”
Full Content: Health Care Dive
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh