A US District Court in Michigan recently approved a proposed class action settlements with the Calsonic Defendants, DENSO Defendants, MAHLE Behr Defendants and Panasonic Defendants.
The settlements resolve allegations against the Settling Defendants that they conspired to raise, fix, maintain, and/or stabilize prices, rig bids, and allocate markets and customers for air conditioning systems sold in the US, in violation of federal antitrust laws.
The settlements affect those who purchased air conditioning systems in the US between Jan. 1, 2001 and Feb. 14, 2017.
Full Content: Ratchet and Wrench
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Johnson & Johnson to Acquire Intra-Cellular Therapies in $14.6 Billion Deal
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
EU Regulators Reevaluate Big Tech Cases as Trump Prepares to Take Office
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand