Just two days after the US Supreme Court offered its decision in Comcast v. Behrend, which upped the requirements for class action certification, Intel Corp. has cited the Court’s ruling in its own antitrust case. Intel is accused of abusing its dominant position in the microprocessor market, barring rivals from entering competition. Plaintiffs are seeking class action certification, but Intel has used the very recent Supreme Court ruling to argue that – as was found in the case against Comcast – that customers have not offered consistent theories in regards to their allegations. If class certification is granted in the Intel case, the company faces millions of computer consumers whose products included the chips.
Featured News
Zillow Sues Compass and Chicago’s MLS Over Private Listings Dispute
May 12, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Tells California Officials Proposed Warner Bros. Discovery Deal Would Strengthen Theater Business
May 12, 2026 by
CPI
Small Canadian Tech Firm Mounts Global Antitrust Fight Against Apple After App Removal
May 12, 2026 by
CPI
Award-Winning Journalists and Narrators Sue Google Over Alleged Voice AI Training
May 12, 2026 by
CPI
Lawmakers Look to Public Health Framework for Regulating Social Media
May 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos