Justifying Antitrust Intervention in ICT Sector Patent Disputes: How to Address the Hold-Up Problem
Kai-Uwe Kuhn, Dec 20, 2013
The economic justification for any regulatory intervention in patent litigation, especially those for standard essential patents, comes from the view that hold-up of users of patents is endemic to some industries, especially ICT. The paper reviews these reasons why hold-up is more likely in ICT industries and discusses the type of evidence that is available. It discusses the strengths and limitations of competition policy instruments and notes that addressing the issue is far more appropriate under an abuse of dominance standard that allows for exploitative abuses to be addressed. It is finally explained that nevertheless the use of such an instrument has severe limitations and explores the question of how incentives of standard setting organizations can be improved to make commitments to FRAND licensing more meaningful.
Featured News
Michigan Loses Antitrust Case Accusing Oil Giants of Blocking Renewable Energy
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Says European SpaceX Challenger Will Face Full Merger Scrutiny
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
Canada Competition Bureau, Empire Settle Grocery Property-Control Probe
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
DoorDash $131.5 Million Settlement Puts New Focus on Gig Economy Regulation
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
UN Chief Presses for Global AI Framework With Independent Oversight
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton