The US Supreme Court has reportedly denied an appeal by power management company Eaton Corp Plc of a lower court’s jury verdict against the company, accused by a rival of hampering competition by making exclusive agreements with truck transmission manufacturers. Eaton was accused by Z.F. Meritor of colluding with the manufacturers in the sale of heavy-truck transmissions in deals that allowed the manufacturers to earn money rebates if enough of Eaton’s products were purchased. Additionally, the rival accused Eaton of requiring that those manufacturers more favorably price the transmissions than those of Meritor’s. In a statement, Eaton acknowledged the rarity for the Supreme Court to hear appeals, though highlighted the company’s disappointment in the decision.
Featured News
South Korean Regulators Reward Team Behind Major Sugar Price-Fixing Bust
Apr 26, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Sues Dozens of Gas Companies Over Price Fixing
Apr 26, 2026 by
CPI
Brazil Antitrust Regulator Advances Probe Into Google’s Use of News Content
Apr 26, 2026 by
CPI
CFTC Sues New York Over Authority in Prediction Market Regulation
Apr 26, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Expands Antitrust Investigations Across US Agriculture Sector
Apr 26, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Energy & Data Centers
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
AI Data Centers: Competition Law and the Energy Challenge
Apr 27, 2026 by
Charles Whiddington & Domniki Mari
Teaming Up Without Tripping Up: Antitrust Guardrails For Energy Infrastructure Collaborations
Apr 27, 2026 by
Benjamin Huffman, Ann O'Brien & Josh Sturtevant
Mergers Among Electricity Generators: Recent Enforcement and Emerging Trends
Apr 27, 2026 by
Sam Malech & Matt Wohlleben
Energy and Data Centers: Key Competition Considerations
Apr 27, 2026 by
Victoire Binchet, Michael Cousin, Al Mangan & Jugwal Doyen