US activist investor Paul Singer’s Elliott Associates faces a disclosure probe over an alleged violation of local rules when it tried to block merger of two Samsung Group affiliates last year. South Korea’s local regulations mandate that a trader issue a public disclosure within five days of acquiring over 5% in a listed company.
As detailed by ValueWalk, last year Samsung Electronics Co Ltd’s controlling Lee family won a merger of two Samsung affiliates by a thin margin. However, before the shareholder vote on July 17, Elliott initiated a fierce campaign against the merger proposal, arguing that the merger would only benefit shareholders of Cheil Industries, in particular, the Lee family.
Earlier, the Seoul High Court rejected an appeal filed by Elliott Associates to block the Samsung C&T merger. The hedge fund contended that the merger would be unfair and unlawful and significantly damage the interests of Samsung C&T shareholders.
Paul Singer’s $27 billion hedge fund initially held a 4.95% stake in Samsung C&T’s construction company. Elliott boosted its stake in the company to 7.12% and launched an opposition to the merger between Samsung C&T and Samsung Group’s holding company Cheil Industries.
It was felt that Elliott Associates violated a local law that mandates public disclosure within five days of acquiring over 5% in a listed company. Korean authorities suspected that Elliott already controlled the increased number of shares through a total return swap negotiated with brokerage houses before the June 2 disclosure.
Full content: Finance Asia
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li