By Bruce M. Owen (Stanford University)
Media of communication present challenges to regulators and antitrust analysts. While it has become traditional to view media as “platforms” that support “multi-sided markets,” it is far from clear that media markets for inputs and outputs are usefully treated as belonging to a new and unique category of business enterprise. Most firms produce multiple products or services and make or buy multiple inputs. A price change for any one of these inputs or outputs affects the demand and supply of all other inputs and outputs, either through demand or supply relationships or both. Media are different from other firms because they supply goods that are non-rivalrous, subject to network effects and important to political processes. Calling such firms “platforms” and subjecting them to an analytical island reserved for “multi-sided markets” does not advance our understanding of media antitrust and regulatory policy issues.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI