Marc van der Waude, Marc van der Waude, Nov 01, 2009
The purpose of this contribution is to explore the status types that settlements and reverse payments could have under Article 81 EC. It seeks to identify the elements of the legal tests which could possibly be applied to assess the legality of such settlements and, in particular, those providing for a value transfer from the originator to the generic firm. This will be done as follows: Section 2 summarizes the main findings of the Final Report on settlement agreements; Section 3 makes an inventory of relatively old case law that dealt with comparable issues or those related to patent settlement agreements; and Section 4 makes an attempt to distill a legal test from the two previous sections for the assessment of patent settlement agreements between originator and generic firms under EC competition law.
Featured News
Film Groups Ask State Attorneys General to Challenge Netflix’s Bid for Warner Bros.
Jan 29, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Buys Israeli AI Audio Startup Q.ai in Undisclosed Deal
Jan 29, 2026 by
CPI
Hong Kong Watchdog Targets Alleged Bid-Rigging Network in Major Building Tender Probe
Jan 29, 2026 by
CPI
Senate Committee Advances Crypto Regulation Bill, but Partisan Split Raises Doubts
Jan 29, 2026 by
CPI
Fried Frank Expands Antitrust Practice With New Washington, DC Partner
Jan 29, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber