Review of Reverse-Payment Agreements: The Agencies, the Courts, Congress, and the European Commission
Elai Katz, William Rooney, Nov 01, 2009
Two bills seeking to ban reverse-payment agreements are currently pending in Congress, and the European Commission has declared that such agreements, depending on the circumstances, may violate European competition laws. Meanwhile, several U.S. Courts of Appeals have upheld reverse-payment settlements as lawful if the restrictions in the settlement are within the scope of the patent. This article provides an overview of the treatment of reverse-payment agreements by the agencies, the appellate courts, Congress, and the European Commission, without advocating a view on the legality of such agreements or the merits of court decisions, proposed legislation, or investigations relating to them.
Featured News
Sullivan & Cromwell Names New Antitrust Co-Head
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
Danish Furniture Brand Hübsch Fined €670,000 in Price-Fixing Case
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
UK Court Backs Ofcom in Legal Battle With Meta, TikTok and X
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
House Democrat Targets Trump’s Antitrust Settlements With New Oversight Bill
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
Vail Resorts, Alterra Seek Dismissal of Ski Price-Fixing Suit, Deny Collusion Claims
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI