Joseph Farrell, Michael Katz, Nov 01, 2006
There has been considerable debate concerning whether consumer surplus or total surplus should be the welfare standard for antitrust. This debate misses two critical issues. First, antitrust is not straightforwardly welfarist. It does not maximize but protects, and it does not forbid all actions that seem likely to lower some welfare measure. Second, the enforcement process involves multiple steps and multiple decision makers. The authors conclude that, while some popular arguments for a consumer surplus standard are weak, other arguments have some merit.
Featured News
Amazon Loses Bid to Delay FTC Antitrust Trial as California Case Looms
Oct 11, 2026 by
CPI
Nvidia Weighs Buying Reflection AI
Oct 11, 2026 by
CPI
UK Weighs Macquarie Remedy for Energy Assets Deal
Oct 11, 2026 by
CPI
UniCredit’s Commerzbank Deal Faces EU Scrutiny
Oct 11, 2026 by
CPI
US Justice Department Probes TV Networks Over White House Coverage Halt
Oct 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton