By: Naveen Thomas (CLS Blue Sky Blog)
The definition of material adverse effect (“MAE”) in mergers and acquisitions agreements has become one of the most extensively debated, litigated, and analyzed provisions in contracts. Over the past two decades, its average length has nearly tripled as lawyers meticulously negotiate and scrutinize every aspect in deal after deal.
However, in an upcoming article, I propose that the persistent drive to customize MAE definitions is ultimately inefficient and counterproductive. According to Delaware law, standardized clauses could offer the same advantages as customized ones, eliminating the significant but often overlooked costs associated with lengthy negotiations. Rather than getting caught up in the fine details and disputes surrounding MAE definitions, lawyers could enhance their effectiveness by directing their limited leverage towards other contract provisions that serve their objectives…
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI