A PYMNTS Company

SCOTUS Hears Cases That Could Make Challenging FTC & SEC Rulings Easier

By  |  November 7, 2022
SCOTUS Hears Cases That Could Make Challenging FTC & SEC Rulings Easier

The US Supreme Court on Monday began hearing arguments in two cases that could make it easier to challenge the regulatory power of federal agencies in disputes involving the Federal Trade Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The justices are weighing an appeal by Scottsdale, Arizona-based Axon after a lower court dismissed the Taser manufacturer’s lawsuit contesting the constitutionality of the FTC’s structure in a bid to counter an antitrust action related to its acquisition of a rival.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    In a separate case, the justices will consider the SEC’s appeal of a lower court’s decision reviving a challenge brought by a Texas accountant named Michelle Cochran to the legality of its in-house tribunal after it faulted her audits of publicly traded companies.

    Related: DOJ, FTC & EC Hold Second US-EU Joint Technology Competition Policy Dialogue

    At issue in both cases is whether targets of an agency’s enforcement action may challenge its structure or processes in a federal district court or must first endure the agency’s administrative proceedings, which may be costly and time-consuming.

    “The agency can’t help us with that claim,” Paul Clement, Axon’s lawyer, told the justices. “They’re powerless to do anything with that claim, but the district court isn’t.”

    Some members of the court’s 6-3 conservative majority appeared sympathetic. “What sense does it make for a claim that goes to the very structure of the agency having to go through the administrative process?” conservative Justice Samuel Alito asked.