Ryanair Holdings lost three more court challenges to COVID-19 bailouts for rival carriers after a European Union court said support for Finnair Oyj and SAS AB didn’t break the bloc’s State aid rules, reported Bloomberg.
In two cases concerning SAS, the EU General Court ruled Wednesday, April 14, that Swedish and Danish aid “does not amount to unlawful discrimination.” In a third case, the judges said a €600 million (US$718 million) loan guarantee for Finnair is also in line with EU law.
Ryanair, which earlier this month warned that it will struggle to return to profit this year, has filed more than a dozen lawsuits contesting EU approvals for pandemic aid doled out by governments to carriers including Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Air France-KLM. The Irish low-cost carrier argues that the aid for selected airlines creates an unfair advantage and will help rivals to emerge stronger, slash fares, and swallow up others.
The company lost its first two cases in February, when EU judges ruled that French and Swedish State support was appropriate for tackling serious disturbances to the countries’ economies caused by the pandemic. Ryanair has argued that French and Swedish programs mainly benefited Air France-KLM and SAS. It’s appealing the decisions at the EU’s top court. Ryanair has claimed that the EU’s competition regulator isn’t living up to its task of ensuring governments don’t unfairly help a favored company at the expense of others. The European Commission has been under pressure to approve unprecedented State aid to save the pandemic-struck European economy.
Ryanair stated it will appeal the decisions to the EU’s top court “to overturn these unfair subsidies in the interests of competition and consumers.”
“The European Commission’s approvals of the Finnish, Danish and Swedish state aid went against the fundamental principles of EU law,” Ryanair wrote in an emailed statement. Subsidies “encourage inefficiency and will harm consumers for decades.
The court on Wednesday said the Commission didn’t make a mistake “solely because the aid measures for SAS did not benefit all of the victims of the damage caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI