Restrictive Practices in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Reverse Payment Agreements Seeking for a Balance between Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Olga Gurgula (University of London)
Abstract: Reverse payment agreements have attracted the close attention of competition authorities as they are suspected to be the fundamental reason for encumbering competition in the pharmaceutical sector. For more than a decade the U.S. competition and judicial authorities have been scrutinising them, developing specific approaches suitable for their assessment. However, once the practice was deemed to be settled, the Third Circuit questioned this practice employing the new test. In the EU this type of agreement was not in focus until recently, therefore no relevant case law has developed whatsoever. Such uncertainty regarding the possible further developments in the assessment of reverse payment agreements is detrimental to the pharmaceutical industry, as it hinders companies’ ability to adopt their business strategies without the fear of triggering antitrust liability. This article will examine the current status of the reverse payment agreements in both jurisdictions, analyse the application of article 101 TFEU and Section 1 of the Sherman Act along with other relevant legislative provisions, the applied tests and approaches, and specific examples of the agreements decided by the U.S. courts. Such a discussion pursues the practical goal of expanding understanding of what constitutes permitted behaviour for pharmaceutical companies when concluding this type of agreement with a view to avoiding antitrust liability.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI