Emilio José Archila, the attorney representing Cuadernos Carvajal, has questioned the findings presented by the country’s competition authority in the so-calles ‘notebook cartel’ case. The case also involved multinationals Kimberly Clark and Scribe, which avoided fines by applying to the country’s leniency laws.
“When viewing the Superintendence’s ruling, we find that there are some individuals who have been sanctioned because they attended a single lunch meeting over 10 years ago. There are people also whose only sin was to be copied in an e-mail. They have given out 200 million peso fines, without even being able to tell whether the message was even read or not” said the attorney.
Carvajal’s defense lawyer added that, in any case, there had been no actual harm done to Colombia’s notebook market. “The alleged agreements never existed, and the SIC itself has said there is no evidence of there being any harm done to consumers based on the various companies’ share of the market.”
Full Content: Vanguardia
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI