The European Court of Justice issued an interesting judgment on the extent to which existing antitrust price-fixing principles can be applied to interactions between the administrator of a shared technology platform and its users. Specifically, in the Eturas case, the ECJ had to consider the extent to which users’ involvement in an anticompetitive concerted practice initiated by the system administrator of a shared IT platform may be inferred simply from the fact that the administrator sent messages to users concerning pricing and centrally implemented technical rules that affected how users could display their prices.
Featured News
Seoul Presses Firms to Hold Prices Amid Rising Costs
Apr 1, 2026 by
CPI
SEC and CFTC Release First-Ever Crypto Classification Framework
Mar 31, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Must Face Antitrust Lawsuit From Phhhoto, US Judge Rules
Mar 31, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Prosecutors Seeking Information on Possible Insider Trading on Polymarket
Mar 31, 2026 by
CPI
Senators Press SEC Chair Over Enforcement Chief’s Abrupt Exit Amid Crypto Case Questions
Mar 31, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers