The Persistent Problems of Net Neutrality or Why Are We Still Lacking Stable Net Neutrality Regulation
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Konstantinos Stylianou (University of Leeds)
Abstract: The debate on net neutrality has been around long enough to allow its various aspects to emerge and develop sufficiently. Yet we are still far from reaching a resolution that garners multi-stakeholder support and offers some guarantees of stability. The volatility of net neutrality regulation is evidenced by the failure of various jurisdictions to enact stable rules, even after years of persistent efforts.
The second problem concerns the fixation of stakeholders with certain historical features of the Internet, which are seen as immutable axioms that should define today’s Internet the same way they did decades ago (e.g. end to end, neutrality, openness). This clinging is impractical because the Internet and the marketplace around it have evolved and the continuing application of historical principles without justifying their modern relevance obscures rather than illuminates the debate. To set the discussion on the proper base, it is therefore advised that the starting point for the debate is not how to ensure neutrality, openness, non-discrimination and the end to end principle, but whether those characteristics apply with the same force today as when the Internet was first conceived and commercialized. Once there is agreement as to which principles serve the Internet better, the discussion can continue on how to safeguard them.
Third, and on a related topic, to determine whether regulation is needed to safeguard the Internet’s desired features (as per above), regulators need to determine the competitive conditions in the market, which includes the identification of potential bottlenecks and the power interrelations among them. Current practice seems to ignore a prevalent form of competitive pressure in telecommunications, namely vertical competition, which, if taken into account, should affect the way way regulators view the necessity or type of appropriate regulation.
Featured News
EU Brands Apple’s iPadOS as Gatekeeper in Tech Crackdown
Apr 29, 2024 by
CPI
Brussels to Investigate Meta Platforms’ Handling of Disinformation on Facebook and Instagram
Apr 29, 2024 by
CPI
OpenAI Faces Privacy Complaint in Vienna Over ChatGPT’s Data Handling
Apr 29, 2024 by
CPI
EU Launches Investigation into Czech State Aid for Digital TV Operators
Apr 29, 2024 by
CPI
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI