Posted by Social Science Research Network
Common Carrier Essentialism and the Emerging Common Law of Internet Regulation Daniel Deacon (Harvard)
Abstract: This essay examines a new basis for the FCC’s jurisdiction over Internet-based networks and services — namely section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The essay argues that, as interpreted by the courts, section 706 gives the Commission a potentially expansive jurisdiction over services traditionally falling outside its core jurisdiction over “common carriers.” At the same time, the use of section 706 as a basis of jurisdiction requires that the FCC regulate using a standards-based system involving the ex post enforcement of vaguely worded prohibitions. Thus, the emergence of section 706 as a standalone basis for jurisdiction may push the FCC toward a more common-law, antitrust-like system of regulation than the command-and-control-style system with which it is historically most familiar. Drawing on the rules versus standards literature, the essay outlines the pluses and minuses of such a system as applied to Internet-based networks and services. In particular, it argues that a standards-based system under section 706 provides the Commission with much-needed flexibility to deal with emerging communications technologies, but that it will require the FCC to develop more robust mechanisms for enforcement and adjudication than it has traditionally had.
Although the FCC recently reclassified broadband Internet access providers as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act — thus giving the Commission jurisdiction over those carriers that is independent of section 706 — the potential scope of section 706 is much wider than the scope of the reclassification. Thus, section 706 is still likely to provide an important arrow in the FCC’s quiver going forward.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI