A PYMNTS Company

US: Senator launches bid to end NFL antitrust exemption

By  |  September 17, 2014

A US Senator is set to introduce legislation that would end the NFL’s antitrust exemption and other benefits it enjoys from its status as a nonprofit company if the League fails to change the name of the Washington Redskins, seen by critics as a highly offensive and racist moniker.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    According to reports, Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) announced Tuesday that she will introduce a bill to end the league’s antitrust exemption, along with its tax-exempt status and other benefits, following controversy over the NFL’s refusal to change the Redskins name. Cantwell, who was once the char of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, said she is launching the Change the Mascot campaign to have the team name changed.

    ”The NFL needs to join the rest of Americans in the 21st century,” she said in a statement. “It is about right and wrong.”

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    The Change the Mascot group is backed by a coalition of Native American and social justice groups, reports say, and includes the National congress of American Indians and the Oneida Indian Nation. The group is pressing the NFL’s other 31 team owners to force Redskins owner Dan Snyder to change the team name and mascot.

    In a letter sent to NFL team owners, the Change the Mascot group argues that due to the league’s tax-exempt status and antirust exemptions, the owners must ensure that “taxpayer resources are no longer being expended to promote this slur,” referring to the Redskins name, say reports.

    Full content: Washington Post

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.