Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development (1950)(reprint)
Dec 20, 2013
To have the incentive to undertake research and development, a firm must be able to appropriate returns sufficient to make the investment worthwhile. The benefits consumers derive from an innovation, however, are increased if competitors can imitate and improve on the innovation to ensure its availability on favorable terms. Patent law seeks to resolve this tension between incentives for innovation and widespread diffusion of benefits. A patent confers, in theory, perfect appropriability (monopoly of the invention) for a limited time in return for a public disclosure that ensures, again in theory, widespread diffusion of benefits when the patent expires.
Featured News
States Vow to Continue Antitrust Fight Against Live Nation Despite DOJ Settlement
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
White House Cybersecurity Plan Calls on Private Sector to Partner on US Operations
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
Big Tech Data Centers Become Wartime Targets After Drone Strikes on Amazon Sites
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Sues Pentagon to Block National Security Blacklist Over AI Restrictions
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
A $300 Billion Crypto Market Is Propping Up US Government Debt
Mar 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece