Licensing Of Standard Essential Patents: Antitrust Intervention Is Not Big Enough A Fix
Eliana Garces, Dec 20, 2013
The recent antitrust interventions against patent holders issuing injunctions to assert standard essential patents have caused a stir and a debate on the role of antitrust enforcement in licensing negotiations. This piece argues that the way antitrust intervention is being framed allows regulators to restrict the behavior of the patent holder staying away from the issue of FRAND determination. Yet, uncertainty about the meaning of reasonableness and about what is and is not allowed under FRAND commitments lies behind most litigation activity surrounding SEPs. Without more clarity on what can or cannot be accepted under FRAND it is unlikely that substantial progress will be achieved in reducing costly litigation. Antitrust enforcement is ill placed to do the job. In the face of uncertainty about Courts’ ability to develop a consistent line across the globe, standard setting organizations have a role to play in shedding some light on fair licensing of SEPs.
Featured News
Newsom Signs Sweeping California Data Center Oversight Package
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Frozen-Potato Producers Must Face Most Price-Fixing Claims, Judge Rules
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Reaches Deal With States, Clearing Major Hurdle to Warner Bros. Takeover
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Russia Opens Antitrust Cases Over Generic Versions of Pfizer’s Eliquis
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Google Faces €403 Million EU Privacy Penalty Over Location Tracking
Sep 21, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski