Tim Wu, Dec 20, 2013
Competition law and Intellectual Property have divergent intellectual cultures–the former more pragmatic and experimentalist; the latter influenced by natural law and vested rights. “The US Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis is an intellectual victory for the former approach, one that suggests that antitrust law can and should be used to introduce greater scrutiny of the specific consequences of intellectual property grants…
Featured News
Google Sues Alleged China-Based Hackers Over Widespread Phishing Scheme
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Europe Moves to Clarify What Counts as Personal Data
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Larry Ellison Offers $40 Billion Guarantee as Paramount Renews Bid for Warner Bros
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Google Sues Texas Firm Over Alleged Massive Scraping of Search Data
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Italy Fines Apple Nearly 100 Million Euros Over App Store Practices
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi