Tim Wu, Dec 20, 2013
Competition law and Intellectual Property have divergent intellectual cultures–the former more pragmatic and experimentalist; the latter influenced by natural law and vested rights. “The US Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis is an intellectual victory for the former approach, one that suggests that antitrust law can and should be used to introduce greater scrutiny of the specific consequences of intellectual property grants…
Featured News
Live Nation Pushes Back on States’ Renewed Bid for DOJ Settlement Records
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
California Subpoenas OpenAI as Scrutiny of AI Cybersecurity Risks Grows
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Thomson Reuters Faces Antitrust Suit Over $650 Million Casetext Acquisition
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Sandoz Agrees to $400 Million Deal to Resolve States’ Generic-Drug Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon e-Book Buyers Move Closer to Class Certification in Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton