The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has gone to court in efforts to review sealed documents produced from a separate antitrust case concerning health insurers in Pennsylvania. According to reports, arguments were heard Thursday over whether the newspaper should be allowed to review the documents, which include motions and exhibits that are part of a case in which the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is accusing health insurer Highmark of monopolizing the western region of the state. The newspaper’s lawyers have filed a motion claiming its request to review the documents follows legal precedents, further arguing that it is part of the public’s rights to judicial records to have the paper review the documents. Both the university and Highmark have requested that the documents remain sealed.
Full Content: Thomson Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI