A PYMNTS Company

Competition, Equity and Quality in Healthcare

 |  May 28, 2013

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka, University of Bristol – Leverhulme Centre for Market and Public Organisation (CMPO) and Carol Propper, University of Bristol – Leverhulme Centre for Market and Public Organisation (CMPO); analyze Competition, Equity and Quality in Healthcare

    ABSTRACT: In this paper we focus on the implications of consumer heterogeneity for whether competition will improve outcomes in health care markets. We show that competition generally favours the majority group as higher quality for the majority is an effective way to increase the quality signal and attract patients. A regulator who is concerned about equity may protect the minority group by not introducing competition. Alternatively, if the minority group is favoured by the providers under monopoly, competition can improve equity by forcing the providers to increase quality for the majority group.