Diogo Thomson de Andrade, Carlos Ragazzo, Jul 24, 2012
Throughout the world, competition authorities are used to allocating much of their human resources to cartel detection and punishment. The main justification for this allotment is linked to the potential harm that these agreements pose for the economy and, foremost, to consumers. It is not a coincidence that many countries criminalize cartels, requiring action not just on behalf of competition authorities but also that of other investigative State authorities, such as, for example, public prosecutors.
Featured News
EU Raises Antitrust Objections to MMG’s Anglo American Nickel Deal
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Backs Bond Requirement in Paramount-Warner Bros. Antitrust Fight
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
Crowell & Moring Adds DOJ, FTC Veterans to Antitrust Practice
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Weighs Antitrust Flexibility for AI Safety Cooperation
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
OpenAI Challenges Secrecy of Musk Companies’ Apple Deal
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski