Diogo Thomson de Andrade, Carlos Ragazzo, Jul 24, 2012
Throughout the world, competition authorities are used to allocating much of their human resources to cartel detection and punishment. The main justification for this allotment is linked to the potential harm that these agreements pose for the economy and, foremost, to consumers. It is not a coincidence that many countries criminalize cartels, requiring action not just on behalf of competition authorities but also that of other investigative State authorities, such as, for example, public prosecutors.
Featured News
South Korean Food Giant CJ Cheiljedang Apologizes Again in Sugar Collusion Case
Mar 24, 2026 by
CPI
EU Competition Chief to Press Big Tech on AI Power During US Visit
Mar 24, 2026 by
CPI
Colorado Eying Possible Do-Over of Landmark AI Law
Mar 24, 2026 by
CPI
Poland Begins Work on Digital Tax Bill in Move Targeting Global Tech Platforms
Mar 24, 2026 by
CPI
Low Offers for Instant On Undercut HPE’s Juniper Merger Remedy
Mar 24, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak