Diogo Thomson de Andrade, Carlos Ragazzo, Jul 24, 2012
Throughout the world, competition authorities are used to allocating much of their human resources to cartel detection and punishment. The main justification for this allotment is linked to the potential harm that these agreements pose for the economy and, foremost, to consumers. It is not a coincidence that many countries criminalize cartels, requiring action not just on behalf of competition authorities but also that of other investigative State authorities, such as, for example, public prosecutors.
Featured News
US Appeals Court Reinstates AI Pricing Antitrust Case Against Atlantic City Casinos
Jul 29, 2026 by
CPI
Democratic Senators Seek SEC Investigation Into Trump Media’s Premium
Jul 29, 2026 by
CPI
Publicis Challenges Naming in India Antitrust Investigation Before Delhi Court
Jul 29, 2026 by
CPI
Appeals Court Revives AI Hotel Pricing Antitrust Lawsuit Against Caesars, MGM
Jul 29, 2026 by
CPI
EU Warns FIFA Commercial Overhaul Could Violate Competition Law
Jul 29, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes