China’s Supreme People’s Court has issued a judgment that will make it easier for plaintiffs to show abuse of dominance or monopolization. The court reduced the plaintiff’s burden of proof in a civil lawsuit against companies or public utilities. The burden has shifted, so now it is the other side that must show that they did not abuse their dominant market position, for dominance cases, or that they did not restrict competition or exclude competitors, for monopolization cases.
Featured News
FTC Launches Healthcare Task Force to Sharpen Enforcement
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
White House Pushes Congress for National AI Law to Override State Rules
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Copyright Settlement Lawyers Cut Fee Request to $187.5 Million
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino Defends Company in Manhattan Antitrust Trial
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Nvidia Faces New Antitrust Questions Over $20 Billion Groq Licensing Deal
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak