Eliana Garces, Apr 01, 2010
Interesting questions are being asked about the policy implications of relaxing commonly held assumptions about how people make decisions. If consumers are not always rationally maximizing some kind of utility function, can we still claim that their decisions are always in their own best interest? And should this be a policy concern at all? We commonly rely on the competitive process to produce the market outcomes that are the most favorable to consumers. In a model of rational behavior, firms in a competitive environment compete mostly on the merits and the market outcome is efficient and welfare-maximizing. Does this result continue to hold when the rationality assumption about consumer behavior is relaxed?
Featured News
EU Raises Antitrust Objections to MMG’s Anglo American Nickel Deal
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Backs Bond Requirement in Paramount-Warner Bros. Antitrust Fight
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
Crowell & Moring Adds DOJ, FTC Veterans to Antitrust Practice
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Weighs Antitrust Flexibility for AI Safety Cooperation
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
OpenAI Challenges Secrecy of Musk Companies’ Apple Deal
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski