Jordi Gual, Anne Perrot, Michele Polo, Patrick Rey, Klaus Schmidt, Rune Stenbacka, Apr 01, 2006
This report argues in favour of an economics-based approach to Article 82, in a way similar to the reform of Article 81 and merger control. In particular, the authors support an effects-based rather than a form-based approach to competition policy. Such an approach focuses on the presence of anti-competitive effects that harm consumers and is based on the examination of each specific case, based on sound economics and grounded on facts.
Featured News
Utah Becomes Site of Last Flashpoint Between States and the White House Over AI Regs
Feb 27, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Agency Vows to Fight States Over Prediction Market Crackdown
Feb 27, 2026 by
CPI
Netflix Withdraws From Warner Bros Bid as Paramount Emerges With ‘Superior’ Offer
Feb 27, 2026 by
CPI
OCC Issues Proposed Rules for Stablecoin Activity Under the GENIUS Act
Feb 26, 2026 by
CPI
EU Court Adviser Recommends Dismissing Meta’s Appeals in Antitrust Data Dispute
Feb 26, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece