Amazon, the tech giant, has decided to cut down the number of its private clothing brands to address the concerns raised by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in an antitrust lawsuit.
Amazon is now phasing out 27 out of its 30 in-house label clothing brands and is in talks to exit from the private brands business as a concession to the FTC. The FTC began investigations into Amazon under the Trump administration on allegations of breaking antitrust laws.
According to Matt Taddy, Vice President of Amazon Private Brands, the logic behind the reduction of the product lines is “If there are products that aren’t resonating with customers, we deprecate those items and look for other opportunities to better meet their needs”.
Amazon’s choices are underpinned by customer preferences for their major labels such as Amazon Basics and Amazon Essentials, which are renowned for delivering superior value through top-notch products at attractive price points. Amazon is planning to phase out its Rivet and Stone & Beam furniture brands and the Amazon Basics label will remain.
Related: What’s Going On Between The FTC And Amazon?
The FTC has raised allegations of Amazon preferencing its goods to the detriment of independent sellers, using third-party data to choose goods to sell, refusing to allow big rivals to advertise against its products on its platform, and using below-cost prices on goods and services to keep customers under the Prime subscription.
Amazon has denied all accusations and will be meeting with FTC chair Lina Khan and commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya next week to argue against the antitrust suit.
The shelving of its private clothing brands is part of Amazon’s strategies to reduce costs and comply with the FTC’s investigation. It remains to be seen whether this move will result in a favorable outcome, although Amazon is confident of its facts and arguments. With the two parties potentially reaching a settlement, the changes in the market implications and customer choices will be interesting to watch.
Source: Brum Post
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI