In an antitrust case against Google, economist Michael Whinston testified that in 2017, Google changed its advertising auction method, causing prices to rise by 15% and potentially earning the company billions in additional revenue.
Google’s auction system had winners pay just one cent more than the runner-up. In 2016, Google discovered that the runner-up often bid only 80% of the winner’s offer. To close this gap, Google gave the second-place bidder a built-in advantage to make their offer more competitive.
Related: Google Accuses India’s Competition Commission of Protecting Amazon
Whinston stated that Google’s ability to modify these rules illustrates its control over online advertising. The U.S. Department of Justice alleges that Google unlawfully maintains a monopoly over online search by paying web browsers and smartphone makers to make it the default option.
Search ads make up over 60% of Google’s total revenue, amounting to more than $100 billion in 2020. The case continues to unfold, with potentially significant implications for Google’s future in the advertising industry.
Source: Financial Express
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI