In an ongoing legal showdown between Google and the U.S. Department of Justice, the tech giant has accused the government of seeking to penalize it for its market dominance and innovation. Google’s assertions came to light in an unsealed post-trial brief submitted to a federal judge in Washington, D.C., as part of the antitrust case levied against it by the DOJ.
Google vehemently defended its position as the preeminent search engine globally, attributing its success to relentless dedication and innovation. The company argued that any verdict against it in the antitrust trial would contravene established U.S. antitrust law. According to Google, the evidence presented during the trial irrefutably demonstrates its status as the highest-quality and most popular search engine in the United States, with superior advertising monetization. The company further contended that the DOJ’s motive is to artificially boost its competitors’ prospects at the expense of stifling innovation and harming consumers.
Read more: Google’s US Ad Antitrust Suit Trial Date Set For March 2024
Specifically addressing allegations regarding its management of Search Ads 360 (SA360), Google refuted claims of unfair practices, asserting that it is not obligated to engage with competitors like Microsoft on SA360 features. Google argued that its actions align with industry standards and that the Colorado Plaintiffs failed to substantiate any harm to competitors. The company emphasized that any punitive measures against its conduct would ultimately hinder competition by diminishing its incentives to enhance its cross-platform advertising tools in response to advertisers’ needs.
Search Ads 360 (SA360) is a pivotal platform for managing extensive search marketing campaigns across various search engines. It streamlines ad and keyword management, facilitates performance analysis, and offers automated bidding through bid strategies.
Contrary to Google’s defense, the DOJ has accused the tech giant of wielding its market dominance to stifle competition through lucrative contracts with phone manufacturers and web browser operators. These agreements purportedly aim to limit the presence of rival search engines such as Microsoft’s Bing. The DOJ is poised to present its own arguments in an upcoming brief.
Source: Martech
Featured News
Justice Department Moves to End NCAA Transfer Rule
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
Kenya’s Competition Authority Proposes Tougher Regulations on Big Tech
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
KKR Secures EU Antitrust Approval for $24 Billion Acquisition of Telecom Italia’s Fixed-Line Network
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
European Court Sides with Tech Giants in Italian Regulatory Dispute
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
US Steel and Nippon Steel Secure International Approvals for $14.9B Merger
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 31, 2024 by
CPI
AI and Antitrust Considerations in U.S. Health Care
May 31, 2024 by
CPI
Uncertainty in the Bottom Line: New Antitrust Scrutiny and Enforcement in Private Equity Transactions
May 31, 2024 by
CPI
Effecting M&A Diligence When Competitors Are Involved
May 31, 2024 by
CPI
AI, Pharmaceutical Sector, and EU Competition Law and Policy: What Does the Future Look Like?
May 31, 2024 by
CPI