On March 22, 2024, the SDA Bocconi School of Management hosted the inaugural European conference organized by Competition Policy International (CPI), titled “Dynamic Competition in Dynamic Markets: Charting the Path Forward?” Among the discussions held was a fireside chat on “Reflecting on Two Decades Since the Microsoft Decision: Lessons and Insights.”
The panel, moderated by Carmelo Cennamo, Affiliate Professor of Digital Transformation at SDA Bocconi School of Management, brought together esteemed speakers including Mario Monti, Former Italian Prime Minister and European Commissioner; Olivier Guersent, Director-General at DG COMP; and Frédéric Jenny, Chairman of the OECD Competition Committee.
Cennamo initiated the conversation by delving into the motivations behind the Microsoft decision two decades ago and its lasting impact on competition policy. Mario Monti, one of the key actors involved in the decision, provided insights into the complexities surrounding the case, highlighting the leveraging of market power into neighboring markets by Microsoft.
Monti reminisced about the intense lobbying activities in Washington during that period and underscored the significance of the case amid geopolitical changes, notably the enlargement of the European Union in May 2004.
Following Monti’s remarks, Olivier Guersent reflected on the evolving landscape of competition enforcement since the Microsoft case. He emphasized the adaptability of antitrust rules to the digital sector and cited subsequent cases, such as those involving Google, as evidence of continued antitrust scrutiny in the digital realm.Guersent also discussed the European Commission’s efforts to address market dominance through initiatives like the Digital Markets Act (DMA), aimed at curbing anticompetitive behavior by major tech companies.
Frédéric Jenny added a nuanced perspective, questioning the assumptions underlying competition policy, particularly regarding consumer choice and innovation. He challenged the notion that increased consumer choice always leads to enhanced competition, citing examples where consumer inertia may result from strategic barriers rather than lack of options.Jenny’s insights prompted a deeper exploration of the relationship between competition and innovation in digital markets, raising questions about the effectiveness of regulatory interventions in fostering competition.
In his closing remarks, Cennamo acknowledged the complexities surrounding competition policy in the digital age and the ongoing efforts to strike a balance between promoting innovation and preventing anticompetitive behavior.
The panel concluded with a consensus on the need for continuous adaptation of competition policy to address the unique challenges posed by dynamic markets, emphasizing the importance of fostering competition while safeguarding consumer welfare and innovation.
Featured News
US Steel and Nippon Steel Secure International Approvals for $14.9B Merger
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
EU Watchdog Mandates Boardroom Accountability for AI in Banks
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
Senate Democrats Urge DOJ Investigation into Alleged Big Oil Collusion
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
ConocoPhillips Acquires Marathon Oil for $22.5 Billion in Major Energy Sector Consolidation
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Judge Denies Amazon’s Bid to Dismiss FTC Lawsuit Over Prime Membership Practices
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Merger Guidelines Retrospective
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Mergers of Complements
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Personality Traits, Private Equity, and Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Lessons in the Importance of Incipiency, Modern Economics, and Monopsony
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Sharpening Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI