A PYMNTS Company

Justice Department Clarifies Patent-Antitrust Balance in Disney-InterDigital Case

By  |  October 7, 2025

The US Department of Justice has cautioned that courts should not automatically assume patents grant monopoly power or that enforcing them is inherently anticompetitive. The statement came in a filing before a Delaware federal court overseeing a dispute between a Walt Disney Co. subsidiary and InterDigital Inc. over video-compression patents, according to Bloomberg.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division submitted a statement of interest in Disney Enterprises Inc. v. InterDigital Inc. on Monday, advising Judge Maryellen Noreika of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on how antitrust principles should be applied when patented technologies intersect with industry standards. The government emphasized that it was not taking a position on InterDigital’s pending motion to dismiss or stay the case, per Bloomberg.

    According to Bloomberg, the DOJ’s filing discussed how the development of technical standards can have both competitive and anticompetitive effects. The department referenced established legal analysis by Phillip E. Areeda and Herbert Hovenkamp, which recognizes that standard setting is a near-constant feature in information technologies, driven by the need for interoperability across complex networks.

    Standards-setting organizations (SDOs), the filing noted, can lower costs for producers and enhance value for consumers by ensuring compatibility among devices and technologies. Citing prior Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission reports, the filing described how pooling innovative technologies through such standards can promote widespread adoption of new innovations and stimulate dynamic market competition.

    Read more: Sanders, Warren, and Others Press Disney, ESPN on Sports Media Dominance

    The Justice Department also highlighted that standards can emerge either through market competition—where one technology prevails, as in the “VCR versus Betamax” case—or through collaborative, consensus-driven processes. These voluntary SDOs help avoid “standards wars” that can be costly for both businesses and consumers, according to Bloomberg’s account of the filing.

    However, the government cautioned that the cooperation inherent in setting standards carries risks. The Supreme Court has previously warned that private standards can be abused to suppress competition, the DOJ noted, referencing the Allied Tube v. Indian Head, Inc. decision. The Court found that while private standards may provide substantial procompetitive benefits—such as promoting interoperability and innovation—they must be developed through procedures that prevent bias by participants seeking to gain market advantage.

    In sum, the Justice Department’s filing underscored that while patents and standards are central to technological innovation, they must be treated carefully under antitrust law to preserve competition. As Bloomberg reported, the DOJ’s intervention signals the government’s intent to guide courts toward a balanced approach that recognizes both the benefits and potential pitfalls of standardization in patent-heavy industries.

    Source: Bloomberg