A PYMNTS Company

Meta Wins Dismissal of Instagram Shopping Antitrust Suit

By  |  August 31, 2026
Meta Wins Dismissal of Instagram Shopping Antitrust Suit

Meta Platforms Inc. won dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit accusing the social-media company of using ideas from a startup’s business plan to build Instagram’s shopping features, though the plaintiff will have an opportunity to revise parts of its case.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose, California, dismissed claims brought by London-based Ollywan Limited, according to Reuters. The startup had accused Meta of copying its concept for a shopping service built around tagged products before Instagram Shopping was introduced in 2016.

    The ruling gives Meta an early victory in a case seeking to turn a dispute over the development of Instagram’s commerce tools into a federal monopolization claim. DeMarchi concluded that Ollywan brought its antitrust allegations too late and had not adequately shown that Meta’s conduct harmed competition, Reuters reported. The judge nevertheless gave the company a limited opportunity to amend its complaint.

    Ollywan launched a photo-sharing application called Winstag in 2016 that allowed users to tag products and participate in affiliate shopping, according to Reuters. The company alleged that its chief executive had previously provided Meta executives with a business plan after receiving assurances that the information would remain confidential.

    Ollywan later accused Meta of violating U.S. antitrust law through the integration of Instagram and Instagram Shopping, a service that allows consumers to purchase products associated with posts on the platform, Reuters reported. The startup also challenged Meta’s efforts to stop it from using the Winstag name.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    Read more: Meta Reaches $16.68 Billion Deal With US States Over Social-Media Risks

    DeMarchi rejected the trademark-related antitrust theory, concluding that federal competition law did not prevent Meta from asserting its trademark rights, according to Reuters.

    Timing also proved significant. Meta argued that the alleged conduct fell outside the four-year statute of limitations governing federal antitrust claims. DeMarchi questioned why Ollywan waited until two years after it had stopped operating to bring the case, Reuters reported.

    Meta has denied wrongdoing and argued in court that Ollywan was improperly trying to use antitrust law to hold the technology company responsible for the startup’s commercial failure while penalizing Meta for the success of its own service, according to Reuters.

    The dismissal does not necessarily end the litigation. DeMarchi permitted Ollywan to submit an amended complaint, subject to restrictions outlined by the court, Reuters reported.

    The case comes as Meta continues to confront competition-related litigation involving its social-media businesses. Reuters reported that the company is separately defending an antitrust case brought by the defunct photo-sharing app Phhhoto, which alleges Meta drove it out of business. Meta has denied those allegations.

    Meta also prevailed last year against a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit seeking structural remedies involving Instagram and WhatsApp, according to Reuters.

    Source: Reuters