A PYMNTS Company

7th Circuit Revives Claims Against Becton Dickinson

By  |  March 9, 2020

The 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a potential class action accusing Becton Dickinson, two group purchasing organizations and several distributors of conspiring to raise prices of hypodermic syringes, “safety” syringes, and IV catheters. 

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The decision on Friday, March 6, gives health care providers Marion Diagnostic Center, Marion Healthcare, and Andron Medical Associates a chance to beef up their claims that Becton’s arrangements with Premier, Vizient, Cardinal Health, McKesson Medical-Surgical, and others violate federal antitrust laws.

    The plaintiffs, who are health care providers, allege that Becton, Dickinson & Co. (Becton) illegally dominated the markets for conventional syringes, safety syringes, and safety IV catheters. Becton is accused of using exclusionary contracts and rebates to keep rival manufacturers out of these three markets. As a result of its actions, Becton has been able to charge higher prices for its products and impede the introduction of safer options, such as syringes with a much lower risk of needlesticks that transfer HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C to nurses and other care providers

    Full Content:

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.