Michael Hammock, Paul Rubin, May 20, 2011
The debate over online privacy pays too little attention to the costs and benefits of the current systems of privacy protection and advertising-supported online applications. The costs of online privacy-related harm (such as identity theft) and of protective activities are small relative to the benefits from applications that are supported by online advertising, which depends on the collection of personal information. Advocates of increased privacy focus too much on increased privacy as a solution, and not enough on alternative forms of information security. Surveys show that consumers do not like targeted advertising, or the information collection that allows it, but this may be a form of rational irrationality.That is, it may not pay for consumers to understand the costs and benefits of reduced information use.
Featured News
Kimberly-Clark Seeks EU Antitrust Approval for Kenvue Takeover
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Opens Formal Review of Brink’s $6.6 Billion NCR Atleos Acquisition
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Trump Weighs Beef Deregulation Amid Meatpacking Antitrust Scrutiny
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Reaches $16.68 Billion Deal With US States Over Social-Media Risks
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Teva Faces New Antitrust Scrutiny in Turkey Over Copaxone Patents
Aug 26, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Antipasto
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
“Anti-Monopoly” Antitrust Enforcement: Lessons Learned from the Biden Administration
Aug 24, 2026 by
Diana L. Moss
FTC v. Meta: The Importance of Quantitative Evidence in Antitrust
Aug 24, 2026 by
Dennis Carlton, John A. List, Allan Shampine, Hal Sider & Theresa Sullivan
Competitor Information Exchanges: Reducing Market Uncertainty Is What Matters, Not Level Of Detail
Aug 24, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka, Assimakis Komninos, James Killick & Nina Frie
When Politics Meets Merger Control: 10 Transatlantic Takeaways
Aug 24, 2026 by
Rachel Brandenburger