Athletes Challenge NCAA’s $2.8 Billion Settlement Over Compensation Restrictions

Some current and former college athletes are pushing back against a proposed $2.8 billion settlement involving the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), as a federal judge reviews the deal. According to Bloomberg, more than a dozen objections were submitted to the US District Court for the Northern District of California by the January 31 deadline, with some challengers criticizing a provision that allocates most of the settlement funds to male athletes.
The objections highlight concerns that the settlement fails to adequately consider Title IX regulations, which mandate gender equity in college sports. Per Bloomberg, these filings represent a final attempt to influence the court before an April hearing determines the fairness of the resolution.
Judge Claudia Wilken initially granted preliminary approval to the settlement in October. The deal emerged following years of litigation alleging that the NCAA violated antitrust laws by prohibiting college athletes from earning compensation through their name, image, and likeness (NIL).
Under the terms of the agreement, the NCAA and the Power Five conferences would distribute the $2.8 billion settlement over a 10-year span. Additionally, universities would be permitted to provide direct payments and benefits to athletes amounting to up to 22% of their average annual athletic revenue—an unprecedented shift in collegiate athletics that could reshape compensation structures within the billion-dollar industry.
Related: DOJ Raises Concerns Over $2.8 Billion NCAA Settlement
Despite the opposition, both the NCAA and the legal representatives of the class maintain confidence in the settlement’s approval. According to Bloomberg, Steve Berman, managing partner at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and an attorney for the class, stated that most objections had already been considered and dismissed when preliminary approval was granted.
Berman defended the agreement, arguing that the damages constitute a significant percentage of potential recovery in an antitrust case and that the prospective financial benefits could exceed $20 billion. He emphasized that the settlement places athletes “on an equal footing with the pros” and characterized it as a “fair settlement for sure.”
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
French Prosecutors Open Investigation into X’s Algorithmic Bias
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Urges US Appeals Court to Uphold $725 Million Privacy Settlement
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
UnitedHealth Group Withdraws Motion to Dismiss Antitrust Challenge
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Firms Raise Alarm Over Ex-Amazon Exec Leading UK Competition Regulator
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
US Consumers File Lawsuit to Block Nippon Steel’s Acquisition of US Steel
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon