
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs in a groundbreaking antitrust settlement involving the NCAA and the Power Five conferences have requested nearly $525 million in legal fees and costs, according to court filings made Tuesday. The cases center on compensation for college athletes, with the proposed settlement amounting to billions of dollars.
The plaintiffs’ legal team, led by Steve Berman of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Jeff Kessler of Winston & Strawn, is also seeking permission to apply for additional payments annually, as allowed under the settlement terms. These additional requests, if approved, could amount to approximately $250 million over time, as detailed in the filings, per USA Today.
Related: Athletes Behind NCAA Antitrust Settlement Push for Collective Bargaining Rights
The disbursement of these funds would primarily occur over a 10-year period, drawn from various settlement pools established as part of the agreement. According to USA Today, this structure aligns with the broader terms of the settlement, designed to address longstanding disputes over athlete compensation.
The legal battle has been closely watched, given its implications for the NCAA and collegiate sports. Attorneys Berman and Kessler have been at the forefront of the case, championing the rights of student-athletes in a series of high-profile antitrust claims. The requested amounts reflect the extensive legal work involved in reaching a resolution of this magnitude, as noted in court documents.
Source: USA Today
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li