The chairman and managing director of manufacturing conglomerate Bradken have appealed a fine issued by the Federal Court for $22.4 million after the Court found the company had rigged the bidding in the acquisition of Norcast Wear Solutions. The deal was finalized in July 2011 for $217 million. The ruling by the Court was a win for Pala Investments, which initiated the case against Bradken. But the company and its executives have appealed the fine, sending a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange with a request to reverse the decision.
Featured News
France Nears Decision on Potential Antitrust Charges Against Nvidia
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ, FTC Encourage States to Probe High Gasoline Prices
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Poised to Launch In-Depth Antitrust Probe Into Saipem-Subsea7 Merger
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
China Targets Food Delivery Subsidy Battles With New Rules on Platform Competition
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
State Challenge to Media Deal Draws Allegations of Election-Year Motivations
Jul 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol