The chairman and managing director of manufacturing conglomerate Bradken have appealed a fine issued by the Federal Court for $22.4 million after the Court found the company had rigged the bidding in the acquisition of Norcast Wear Solutions. The deal was finalized in July 2011 for $217 million. The ruling by the Court was a win for Pala Investments, which initiated the case against Bradken. But the company and its executives have appealed the fine, sending a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange with a request to reverse the decision.
Featured News
Meta Halts Commercial Terms Rollout After Publishers Raise Concerns in EU, UK
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Nvidia’s $12.9 Billion Hugging Face Deal Draws Justice Department Questions
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Rolls-Royce’s UltraFan Wins £2.5 Billion UK Framework Deal
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Taiwan Blocks Grab’s $600 Million Foodpanda Deal, Citing Uber Ties
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Expands Food Price-Fixing Probe to Four Major Instant Noodle Makers
Oct 28, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI