The Competition Tribunal’s decision, after hearing evidence by the two firms on their conduct at the time, finally brings the case, which started in 2009, to an end. The Competition Commission initiated an investigation into the cartel after it received information from Murray & Roberts when the company successfully applied for corporate leniency on behalf of its subsidiary RSC Ekusasa Mining. The two firms were also involved in an agreement to bid low prices for a tender from Goldfields, in an attempt to punish Duraset. Videx also unsuccessfully attempted to fix prices with RSC Ekusasa Mining on a bid for a tender from Harmony in October 2005 so that it could win the bid.
Full Content: BDLive
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI