
The Office of the Superintendent General of the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) has found the Brazilian Council of Architecture and Urban Planning (CAU/BR) guilty of antitrust violations in the architectural services market. The decision follows an investigation into allegations of price-fixing within the sector.
According to a statement from CADE, the probe was initiated after a complaint was lodged via the Clique-Denúncia platform. The antitrust complaint accused CAU/BR of setting fixed prices for architecture and urban planning services, a practice that undermines fair market competition. While the professional council was legally permitted to approve and publish fee schedules, the investigation found that it had exceeded its mandate.
Per the statement, evidence revealed that CAU/BR went beyond merely approving and disseminating fee schedules. The council actively worked to standardize these pricing structures and integrated them into its Code of Ethics. Furthermore, punitive measures were established for non-compliance, despite the absence of any legal framework supporting such enforcement.
Based on the gathered evidence, CADE determined that CAU/BR had engaged in anticompetitive practices and recommended the imposition of a fine as a penalty. The case has now been referred to CADE’s Tribunal, where it will be assigned to a Rapporteur for a final ruling on the matter.
Source: CADE
Featured News
Atkore Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Denying Copyright for AI-Generated Art
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Morrison Foerster Expands European Antitrust Practice
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
HSBC in Advanced Talks to Sell German Fund Unit to BlackFin Capital Partners
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU’s Antitrust War on Big Tech Heats Up as US Trade Disputes Grow
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li