A PYMNTS Company

US Judge Dismisses Publisher Antitrust Cases Against Google Over AI Search

By  |  October 1, 2026
Google AI pointer

A federal judge has dismissed antitrust lawsuits brought by education technology company Chegg and Penske Media Corporation against Google, rejecting claims that the search giant unlawfully used its market power as artificial intelligence increasingly changes how users interact with online information.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    US District Judge Amit Mehta ruled Wednesday that the allegations made by Chegg and Penske Media, whose publications include Rolling Stone, did not establish violations of federal antitrust law, according to reporting by The Verge.

    The companies had argued in lawsuits filed last year that Google was exploiting its dominant position in search by using publishers’ material in AI-generated results while reducing the need for users to visit the original websites, The Verge reported. They alleged publishers effectively faced a choice between allowing Google to use their content for AI features such as AI Overviews without payment or risking diminished visibility in search results.

    That arrangement, the plaintiffs said, was contributing to declining referral traffic and damaging the advertising and subscription businesses that depend on readers reaching publishers’ websites, according to The Verge.

    Mehta rejected a central element of that argument. According to The Verge’s account of the ruling, the judge concluded that publishers’ expectation that Google would direct users to their websites in exchange for making content available to the search engine did not amount to an agreement protected by antitrust law.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    The judge acknowledged the financial pressures facing online publishers as search technology evolves but said antitrust law was not a substitute for legislative action addressing the economic consequences of technological innovation, The Verge reported.

    Related: Google Takes EU Data-Sharing Orders to Court in Escalating DMA Fight

    The ruling adds another chapter to the increasingly contentious relationship between technology platforms and publishers as generative AI reshapes internet search. Publishers have raised concerns that AI-generated summaries can answer users’ questions directly on search pages, reducing the incentive to click through to the websites that produced the underlying material.

    Those concerns have intensified as some news organizations and smaller websites have experienced substantial declines in traffic associated with changes to AI-powered search, according to The Verge. The publication also cited reporting that Google has begun a pilot involving roughly 100 publishers that are being compensated for contributions connected with AI Overviews, AI Mode and the company’s Gemini AI products.

    Mehta has previously played a central role in litigation involving Google’s search business. In 2024, he issued a major antitrust decision against the company in a separate case concerning its dominance in general internet search, The Verge noted.

    The dismissal of the Chegg and Penske Media cases does not resolve the broader economic dispute over how publishers should be compensated when their material contributes to AI-generated answers. Instead, the ruling indicates that at least the legal theories advanced in these cases did not meet the requirements of existing antitrust law.

    Source: The Verge